disterbia:

image

(via harleybert)

bunniope:

bunniope:

okay. which of you motherfuckers taught my vile little homunculus how to put on eyeliner

it is fucking serving.

(via sableleatherywingsopeninthe711)

mortalityplays:

image

you will miss this in 40 or 48 hours. twitter will smooth your brain down like a river stone, and you will find yourself longing for a social media platform that hasn’t meaningfully changed in a decade. you don’t know I’m posting about you in real time bc Sarah has timestamps switched off. I’m not dead, Grant. Grant, let me out of the casket. Graaaant,

justlgbtthings:

mjalti:

listen, when i go to open my mouth & what comes out is 12 degrees of seperation from what the original topic was, u need to connect the dots bitch. think fast. i’m not gonna hold ur hand but we’re leaving now and visiting every topic along the line. wave it goodbye, don’t get hung up on it

everyone who reblogged this has adhd

(via dirkstridershead-deactivated202)

wondermumbles:

fandomsandfeminism:

You know what the most frustrating thing about the vegans throwing a fit over my “Humans aren’t Parasites” post is?  I really wasn’t trying to make a point about animal agriculture. Honestly, the example about subsistence hunting isn’t the main point. That post was actually inspired by thoughts I’ve been having about the National Park system and environmentalist groups.

See, I LOVE the National Parks. I always have a pass. I got to multiple parks a year. I LOVE them, and always viewed them as this unambiguously GOOD thing. Like, the best thing America has done. 

BUT, I just finished reading this book called “I am the Grand Canyon” all about the native Havasupai people and their fight to gain back their rights to the lands above the canyon rim. Historically, they spent the summer months farming in the canyon, and then the winter months hunter-gathering up above the rim. When their reservation was made though, they lost basically all rights to the rim land (They had limited grazing rights to some of it, but it was renewed year to year and always threatened, and it was a whole thing), leading to a century long fight to get it back. 

And in that book there are a couple of really poignant anecdotes- one man talks about how park rangers would come harass them if they tried to collect pinon nuts too close to park land- worried that they would take too many pinon nuts that the squirrels wanted. Despite the fact that the Havasupai had harvested pinon nuts for thousands and thousands of years without ever…like…starving the squirrels. 

There’s another anecdote of them seeing the park rangers hauling away the bodies of dozens of deer- killed in the park because of overpopulation- while the Havasupai had been banned from hunting. (Making them more and more reliant on government aid just to survive the winter months.) 

They talk about how they would traditionally carve out these natural cisterns above the rim to catch rainwater, and how all the animals benefitted from this, but it was difficult to maintain those cisterns when their “ownership” of the land was so disputed. 

So here you have examples of when people are forcibly separated from their ecosystem and how it hurts both those people and the ecosystem. 

And then when the Havasupai finally got legislation before Congress to give them ownership of the rim land back- their biggest opponent was the Parks system and the Sierra Club. The Sierra Club (a big conservation group here in the US) ran a huge smear campaign against these people on the belief that any humans owning this land other than the park system (which aims at conservation, even while developing for recreation) was unacceptable. 

And it all got me thinking about how, as much as I love the National Parks, there are times when its insistence that nature be left “untouched” (except, ya know, for recreation) can actually harm both the native people who have traditionally been part of those ecosystems AND potentially the ecosystems themselves. And I just think there’s a lot of nuance there about recognizing that there are ways for us to be in balance with nature, and that our environmentalism should respect that and push for sustainability over preserving “pristine” human-less landscapes. Removing ourselves from nature isn’t the answer. 

But apparently the idea that subsistence hunting might actually not be a moral catastrophe really set the vegans off.  Woopie. 

#love seeing discussions about this#because everyone wants to see western conservation as infallible#without realizing that it’s still built on white supremacist and colonialist beliefs

- @finding-my-culture

(via two2ds)

schoolgirllesbians:

if shes not willing to commit unspecified crimes w me whats the point :/

(via vriskasekret)

twerklina:

image

(via fingkisher)

gun-flame:

tiktoks-we-like:

image

(via victorious)

hungwy:

You are a plastic bag that fell into a zoo enclosure and I’m a tiger that needs enrichment

neutral-wizard:

yourdadsghoulfriend:

bluhoneysuckle:

image

Casual reminder going into Pride that these rainbow-washed corporations are 🏳️‍🌈💩✨shit✨💩🏳️‍🌈 :

image

[graphic from HSLU Blog, and data from Forbes]

image

(via monobeargrylls)

tonysopranobignaturals-deactiva:

image

posting not only as a critique of the profit motive under capitalism but also because I fucking hate youtube premium

(via lesbeancats)

pissvortex:

gay af for a man to call another man gay… how do you know he’s gay? from fucking him? 🤨

(via tavbros-legs)

tiktocks:

Waking up to Android vs Apple

(via skyward-sonnet)

i hate it when people are like omg no the naughty squirrel is getting into the bird feeder!

fortooate:

fortooate:

that is squirrel food as well also. you put it out into your backyard which is the squirrels houses as well. in what sense is that not food for the squirrel. cop mindset honestly i do not trust it

putting a tasty pastrami sandwich outside but the plate says ONLY FOR VIRGOS

(via wizardcowpoke)